Warning: Trying to access array offset on false in /home/488921.cloudwaysapps.com/kqfstfvpra/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-word-count/public/class-wpwc-public.php on line 123
Our phones are more powerful than the computers used to put a man on the moon.
And all we use it for are endless games of Snake, Clash of Clans (yes, I’m still playing), or for getting spied on by Facebook.
Wouldn’t it be cool if we could tap into that power for something a little more practical?
I recently got a call from one of my contractor buddies. “Have you heard about this new app thingy that lets you see through walls? Looks pretty cool!”
Like any other home remodeler, I was intrigued.
It turns out that there are a few of these devices that are designed to work with your smartphone. Of those, Walabot and Flir One are two brands that are rapidly gaining market share. I enjoy using the Walabot Stud finder app for my DIY, handyman, and home remodeling work. The Flir is more expensive, so I borrow my buddy’s when solving home comfort issues.
In the next two minutes, I’m going to give you a quick overview and comparison to help you make the best choice. Tool Tally makes tool buying easy!
Walabot DIY Versus Flir Comparison Chart
Walabot
- Uses Radio waves to detect and identify objects such as pipes wires, and studs in a wall
- Must be held directly against a wall
- Requires the Walabot App
- For Android Phones Only
- It is ideal for identifying objects on walls.
Flir One
- Uses an Infrared camera to detect hot and cold spots in a wall, including hot or cold pipes and lack of insulation
- It can be used while standing away from the wall
- Available for both iOS and Android
- Ideal for identifying hot and cold spots.
- Commonly used by professional contractors to diagnose house envelope issues.
We’re talking about two entirely different devices here. One of them uses radar; the other uses an infrared camera. They both see through walls, and they both can help identify objects that are in walls. The Walabot is good for detecting studs, pipes, and wires. The FLIR One is good for detecting heat signatures but not good for finding studs.
Honestly, I feel the Walabot feels a tad gimmicky for my old-fashioned tastes. Check out the Bosch Multi-scanner that can see through 4.75″ of cured concrete or brick! That said, Walabot has really stood the test of time now and has continued with its app updates and responsive customer support. So you won’t go wrong buying one.
Walabot DIY
The Walabot is a sensor that attaches to your phone and allows you to see inside walls to find PVC pipes, metal pipes, wood studs, metal studs and even termites (cool right?).
The Walabot handheld scanner is about the size of a cell phone and easily interfaces with Android smartphones.
If you frequent DIY sites (like ours), you’ve undoubtedly been targeted with ads for this wall scanner. They show someone sliding their phone along the wall and being able to identify studs, plumbing, and electrical wiring miraculously.
The Walabot stud finder works, especially on sheetrock walls. However, what no one talks about is the frequent calibration that it requires. Calibrating the device requires you to make large circles on a wall so it can get a read of the different signals. Only then will it start to detect studs accurately.
However, if you stop scanning, say to drill a hole, sometimes it requires you to recalibrate. It is likely that you will end up spending as much time calibrating as you will working.
It is common to need to calibrate any stud finder and provided that you are working on a home with standard sheetrock, the Walabot is going to work almost well as any other basic stud finder on the market. You’ll have the added advantage of being able to identify what you are looking at in the wall visually with its 3d Imaging. For the tech-savvy homeowner, it makes hanging pictures and shelves much easier.
One of the cool features of the Walabot scanner is that in imaging mode, you can see a large mass of termites in a wall. This insect detection mode can make it handy when trying to identify the height of termite damage in a wall if there is currently an active infestation.
The Walabot DIY is an excellent stud detector for the smartphone age. With time, it’s going to be an industry leader. But it isn’t (yet) the next breakthrough in wall scanning than most of us hoped it was.
Finding Termites
On my first home purchase, we found extensive termite damage underneath the house and wanted to know how far up the walls the damage went. We removed a foot of sheetrock along the base of several walls to check the studs. It was pricey but worthwhile for our peace of mind.
With the Walabot, Imaging Mode can detect heat signatures like mice and termites. I think that it is pretty cool, but it requires an active, untreated infestation to work.
Every time I’ve had an infestation in one of my rental houses, I’ve called the pest company immediately and forgot to test this tool on it. So I have yet to try out this handy feature.
Flir One
Flir One is a thermal camera for detecting heat signatures. It plugs into the bottom of an Android phone or iPhone (you must purchase the correct version for your phone type).
Flir One is now in the fourth generation of its product. They’ve worked out the kinks (not that their first product had many) and are moving forward to creating the best smartphone-compatible infrared camera.
Unlike the Walabot, the Flir One Pro is useful for detecting heat signals. If you need to find a water pipe in a wall, you can run warm water through it, and the pipeline will light up nicely on your screen.
Most home contractors find that the FLIR is handy for thermal imaging and locating spots where heat transfer is occurring. It can allow you to quickly identify warm spots and cold spots, stopping thermal loss and fixing major efficiency problems.
Homeowners with the diy project of home efficiency will find that the Flir offers an insane amount of data in seconds. It is a tool that is designed to help you use your smartphone to lower your electric bills.
The Flir One is surprisingly accurate and versatile as a thermal camera. We’ll do a more in-depth review and camera comparison on it soon.
However, it won’t detect wood studs with enough accuracy to drill into them.
The Flir One Edge Pro is such a handy tool that many contractors and home inspectors keep it in their toolbox with their other hand tools.
It is especially handy for those involved in HVAC repair. It can also help visualize wet drywall from broken pipes or roof leaks to uncover the underlying reason.
Can a Flir One Detect Electrical Wires? A common question is whether a Flir can detect electrical wires. If the wire is under heavy load, it may be able to detect the heat from a wire. If there is a short in the circuitry or a circuit box, the Flir can pick up on those hot spots. For reliable detection or wires inside a wall, you are better off going with the Walabot or a Multi-scanner.
Neither device gives you x-ray vision, but the Walabot is an industry-leading reimagining of the traditional stud finder, and the Flir is a new thermal imaging device that should have competitors worried.
One must appreciate the author’s insightful reflections on the underutilization of smartphone technology! The concept of using devices to penetrate walls with our phones is not only intriguing but profoundly practical. I found it enlightening to read about Walabot and Flir One, as they exemplify how innovation can aid in home renovations. It’s high time we harness these advancements for beneficial purposes rather than succumbing to endless games. A commendable piece that inspires deeper consideration of technology’s role in our lives!
Absolutely fascinating how our smartphones have evolved to such immense capabilities, yet we often squander them on trivial pursuits. The very notion of utilizing this technological marvel to see through walls is astounding! It signifies a leap into practicality that can revolutionize home improvement projects. I commend the author for shedding light on such innovative tools like Walabot and Flir One. Perhaps we are on the brink of an era where technology truly enhances our daily lives beyond mere entertainment.
The article raises intriguing points regarding the underutilization of smartphone capabilities; however, I find it somewhat naive to suggest that tools like Walabot and Flir One could bridge the gap between mundane smartphone use and meaningful technological advancement. Firstly, the premise relies on consumer interest which often wanes quickly once novelty wears off. Moreover, the notion that these devices could contribute significantly to DIY projects overlooks deeper issues such as user proficiency and market saturation. In essence, while these tools might serve niche purposes for a few enthusiasts, they do little to challenge the broader societal tendency towards superficial engagement with technology. We must confront the reality that mere novelty does not equate with substantial progress.
While it’s undeniably true that our smartphones have capabilities exceeding those of the computers that sent humans to the moon, I must question whether we are truly utilizing this potential in a manner that advances our society. Playing games and scrolling through social media can be seen as a grossly ineffective use of such powerful technology. The writer’s suggestion to harness this power for practical applications like stud finding is an interesting one, but it merely scratches the surface. Why are we not innovating beyond these rudimentary tools? The potential for smartphones to revolutionize industries, improve educational access, or enhance communication remains largely untapped. We ought to demand more from our devices rather than resigning ourselves to trivial pursuits.
The juxtaposition between our technological capabilities and their application—or lack thereof—strikes me as both fascinating and alarming. Indeed, smartphones possess capabilities far beyond mere entertainment; however, this disconnect between potential and practice raises pertinent questions about consumer behavior and market trends. Why do innovative tools like Walabot remain underappreciated despite their ingenuity? It could be argued that marketing plays a significant role here; if these devices were presented as essential tools rather than niche gadgets for enthusiasts alone, perhaps they would gain traction among mainstream users. In essence, it becomes crucial to reevaluate how these technologies are marketed if we ever hope to see them utilized effectively.
It is rather perplexing that we have developed such sophisticated technology, yet the majority of individuals seem to squander it on trivial pursuits like mobile games. The question that arises is: what does this say about our priorities as a society? The potential applications of our smartphones, particularly in fields like home improvement, could revolutionize how we approach mundane tasks. However, the lack of widespread adoption for innovative tools like Walabot and Flir One reveals a disconcerting apathy. If we fail to leverage our advancements for practical solutions, are we not undermining the very essence of progress? It is imperative that we cultivate a culture that values utility over entertainment.
While I appreciate your perspective, I must contend that not everyone has the same inclination towards practicality as you do. The gaming industry thrives because it offers an escape from reality—something many find invaluable in today’s fast-paced world. Moreover, your assertion regarding the underutilization of tools like Walabot and Flir One disregards individual preferences and needs. Not every homeowner is a DIY enthusiast; thus, their limited use may simply reflect a lack of necessity rather than indifference to innovation. Perhaps instead of lamenting over wasted potential, we should celebrate the diversity in how technology can enrich various aspects of life.
Your argument raises valid points about societal priorities but fails to consider the multifaceted nature of technological engagement. While it may seem wasteful to indulge in mobile gaming when more practical applications exist, one must recognize that enjoyment and utility are not mutually exclusive concepts. Games provide cognitive benefits and social interactions that can be equally important for mental health and community building as any app designed for home improvement tasks. Thus, rather than disparaging those who choose leisure over labor-saving devices, perhaps we should advocate for a more holistic view on how technology serves human needs—both serious and frivolous.